Posts Tagged ‘coercion’

Principle 5: Democracy is only a Means to an End

Thursday, April 30th, 2009
This is the fourth in a series of 5 posts in which I am trying to illustrate the basic principles of liberty.

During my 2 years in the Air Force ROTC I noticed the common justification for America’s war in Iraq was “to spread democracy.” Sounds great, right? Only on the surface. Democracy in and of itself says nothing about a people’s freedom or level of justice.

Democracy is nothing more than *majority rule.* It can be just as coercive, monopolistic, and exclusive as any dictatorship. It’s not hard to imagine majorities exploiting minorities.

Democracy must be founded on guiding principles. These principles provide limits to what a majority can do. In the case of our country, The Constitution was intended to provide those limits. This *limited democracy* is known as a *republic* or *rule of law.*

Democracy is not an end goal; living peacefully and free from coercion is. Principle based democracy is a means for getting there (certainly not the only means.) One of my motivations for this blog is to convince you that principles of liberty are the foundation that made this country great but they are not an inherent part of democracy. If we don’t carefully abide by and protect our liberties we lose them. The irony, though, is that liberties are rarely taken from us. More often than not we use our democracy to give them away—think Patriot Act.

Liberty: Minimize Coercion

Thursday, January 15th, 2009

I’m currently reading The Constitution of Liberty by Friedrich A. Hayek. So far it is very good, but heavy. So unless you want a very rigorous treatment of the subject I still recommend The Law by Frederic Bastiat as the best (and quickest) book to really understand the philosophy of liberty.

Hayek breaks down the 4 principle ways in which the word liberty is used. Distinguishing between these different uses was a real Ah-ha moment for me, I hope it is helpful for you:

1. Personal or Individual Liberty:

To not be coerced by the arbitrary will of others. When I refer to liberty on this blog, it’s to this type. It is the liberty I am trying to promote.

2. Political Liberty:

To be able to participate in the selection of government, legislation, and administration. Political liberty does NOT guarantee personal liberty.

3. Inner Liberty:

Being able to choose your actions based on your will and convictions. An addict is an example of someone who has lost their inner liberty—but notice the addiction is not a violation of the person’s individual liberty so long as no one coerced them into the addiction.

4. Liberty as “the ability to do what I want”:

This type of liberty is measured only by the sheer number of things a person has access to do. A rich man is “free” to do more things than a poor man. It is “freedom from” obstacles or limits. This is a dangerous definition of liberty because personal liberty (from number 1) is often jeopardized in order to increase “freedom” to do more. Notice the word “power” is a good substitute for type of liberty.

Minimize Coercion

Individual liberty (the first use mentioned) is the key and focus of the entire “freedom movement” or “philosophy of liberty.” In many ways it seems appropriate to say that the fight for liberty boils down to two words: minimize coercion.


Close
E-mail It