Archive for April, 2009

Principle 5: Democracy is only a Means to an End

Thursday, April 30th, 2009
This is the fourth in a series of 5 posts in which I am trying to illustrate the basic principles of liberty.

During my 2 years in the Air Force ROTC I noticed the common justification for America’s war in Iraq was “to spread democracy.” Sounds great, right? Only on the surface. Democracy in and of itself says nothing about a people’s freedom or level of justice.

Democracy is nothing more than *majority rule.* It can be just as coercive, monopolistic, and exclusive as any dictatorship. It’s not hard to imagine majorities exploiting minorities.

Democracy must be founded on guiding principles. These principles provide limits to what a majority can do. In the case of our country, The Constitution was intended to provide those limits. This *limited democracy* is known as a *republic* or *rule of law.*

Democracy is not an end goal; living peacefully and free from coercion is. Principle based democracy is a means for getting there (certainly not the only means.) One of my motivations for this blog is to convince you that principles of liberty are the foundation that made this country great but they are not an inherent part of democracy. If we don’t carefully abide by and protect our liberties we lose them. The irony, though, is that liberties are rarely taken from us. More often than not we use our democracy to give them away—think Patriot Act.

Tesla is Over-Promising with the Model S

Tuesday, April 28th, 2009

Tesla Motors recently revealed their up and coming Model S. It’s beautiful, luxurious, and if it lives up to all of its promises it will be a certain hit. They received over 500 orders the first week. It seems to me, however, that some of their promises are a little too grandiose—the $49,000 price and the late 2011 delivery date just seem too optimistic.

To frame my opinion and argument correctly, it is important to note that I have nothing against Tesla. In fact, they are impressing me more than any other automotive start-up. They delivered their 250th car last month while most companies are still toying with prototypes. Last year I called Tesla an “American car company to be excited about” and I predicted that they would end up benefiting from the recession. I’m still excited about this company.

Tesla promises Model S will be an amazing car at an amazing price:

  • 4-door Electric Sedan (manufactured in-house)
  • Seats 7 (back 2 seats are for children and dwarfs only)
  • 0-60 in 5.9 seconds
  • 160, 230, or 300 mile range
  • Base price: $49,000 (after federal tax rebates)
  • Deliveries start in late 2011

Now compare those promises to what they are currently delivering in the Tesla Roadster:

  • 2-door Electric Coupe/Convertible (manufactured by Lotus)
  • Seats 2
  • 0-60 in 3.9 seconds
  • 244 mile range
  • Base price: $101,500

Delivery Date

To fulfill these promises Tesla has 2.5 years to raise the needed capital; build, buy, or lease a factory; set-up all its tooling; hire and train its workers; and start producing cars. Keep in mind that this all has to be done by a company that has never built a car from the ground up. Until now, they have only been building and installing electric power trains in specialized cars built off site by Lotus. In the meantime, this small company has to continue fulfilling orders for the roadsters (already well behind schedule). I predict that as 2011 approaches, Tesla will announce delays and push back delivery dates.

Price

I was shocked to see that Tesla is promising a price for the Model S that is half what they are charging for the Roadster. I knew that subsequent Tesla cars would become more and more affordable but I never anticipated such a quick dive in price. The batteries are by far the most expensive component of these cars. While time and technological advances will certainly bring the prices down, I can’t imagine that 2.5 years is enough time to see that type of reduction. I predict that Tesla will be forced to raise the price as they get closer to delivery.

I hope I’m wrong

Over promising seems to be in style with automotive start-ups. I hope they don’t do it on purpose, but it wouldn’t surprise me if they do; maybe it has become a necessary evil in order for the companies to generate hype in hopes of attracting investors. I think I speak for a lot of people when I say that I am ready to see an automotive start-up live up to its claims and promises. Will Tesla be the one?

100mpg Hummer H3 by a Provo Utah Company

Thursday, April 23rd, 2009

Raser Technologies, based in Provo, UT,  is a company I’ve been keeping my eye on for a couple years. They caught my attention because they have been working on some uber-cool technologies that have huge potential. They have held my attention because they are so close to where I grew up. A couple of my family members even bought a few shares of Rasor stock (RZ).

Until last week the company was not very well known. That all changed this week when they debuted a 100mpg Hummer H3. It is a 700 volt electric vehicle with a 4 cylinder gasoline engine that acts as a “range extender.” The gas engine has no mechanical connection to the wheels. All it does is turn a generator that charges the batteries, powers the electric motor, or even provides power for off-vehicle electric devices (should be nice for construction workers).

Check it out:

I love cutting edge technology. Stuff like this is paving the way for a whole new generation of automobiles. I do however, have to throw in a warning. Don’t expect to be able to afford one of these, at least not for a few years. This Hummer has 3 large (and expensive) lithium ion battery packs. Even if the Raser components (motor, generator, and controller) can be cost effective when mass produced, the batteries are not—at least not yet. Mobile devices (mostly cell phones) have pushed battery technology to a point never before seen, but it still has further to go. I wonder how far away we are from having vehicles like this in our driveways. 3 years? Maybe 5? Maybe more? I’m excited to see.

Our National Wallet Full of Credit Cards

Thursday, April 16th, 2009

I like to compare the government’s spending habits to me or you living off a Visa card. So when I stumbled on to this illustration by Jess over at WallStats.com I had to share. He made it for a blog post called Visualizing Uncle Sam’s Debt at mint.com. It basically illustrates what the Federal Government owes to our top 7 foreign lenders, but on a household level. Check out the original post if you want a little more explanation.

3301187814_34d9717481_o

Jess has an amazing talent for taking complicated piles of data and presenting them in beautiful, simple layouts. Well done!

Principle 4: Teacher vs Cop

Tuesday, April 14th, 2009
This is the fourth in a series of 5 posts in which I am trying to illustrate the basic principles of liberty.

Generosity should be measured by what you do with YOUR money. It should NOT be measured by what you advocate doing with other people’s money.

Where freedom exists, philanthropy is educating and encouraging others to give (think teachers and missionaries). Where freedom is missing, philanthropy is requiring or forcing others to give (think police and soldiers).

Enough said.


Close
E-mail It