Archive for January, 2009

Shelby Announces World’s Most Powerful Electric Car for 2009

Thursday, January 29th, 2009

Shelby Super Cars (SSC) already has the world’s fastest production car. It’s called Ultimate Aero:

Its stat line is off the charts:

0-60 mph: 2.78 seconds
1/4 Mile: 9.90 seconds at 144 mph
Top Speed: 257.41 MPH / Official Average: 256.15 MPH
Engine: Twin-Turbo V8
Horespower: 1287 BHP @ 6075 RPM
Torque: 1112 ft-lbs @ 6150 RPM

SSC just announced that in 2009 they will make an EV version of the Ultimate Aero. Check out this blurb from the press release:

The Ultimate Aero EV utilizes a twin motor AESP producing an astounding 1,000 HP and 800 lb-ft of torque enabling it to rocket to 60 mph in a mere 2.5 seconds and reach a top speed of 208 mph. Not only does the Ultimate Aero EV have a range of 150-200 miles on a single charge, but SSC’s “Charge on the RunTM” onboard charging system allows for 10 minute full battery recharges on a 220V service.

Just in case you are wondering, that is around 4 times more powerful than the Tesla Roadster!

Now my blog’s readership has doubled (probably from 3 to 6), I’m anticipating that Shelby will be contacting me any day. They are certainly dying for me to drive and review their car. Wanna go for a spin?

Don’t Blame Freedom for this Mess

Tuesday, January 27th, 2009

The popular explanation for the world’s economic crisis seems to be that our free markets were left completely uncontrolled and unmanaged. As a result, greedy men on Wall Street and incompetent CEOs ransacked our entire economy by earning asinine wages and making irresponsible decisions. I think this explanation sucks!

First, our free markets are more regulated and managed than at any other point in the history of our country. It’s rare that you ever hear about a rule or regulation being scrapped. New ones come all the time; they rarely ever go.

Second, the dishonesty of a bunch of Wall Street high-rollers can, AT MOST, have an effect on our economy measured in billions of dollars. Stated otherwise, it’s a drop in the bucket! Remember how the $700B bailout package is doing almost nothing? Our economy’s magnitude is measured in trillions. Bernie Madoff sinking our economy is the equivalent of me taking on a US Navy Destroyer with my BB gun.

Third, those incompetent CEOs are the world’s highest achieving business men and women. They only reached their positions after years of continued success (okay, except for Larry and Sergey). The politicians calling the CEOs incompetent, on the other hand, rarely have a track record of anything but politicking, finger pointing, baby kissing and hypocrisy. Allow me a small illustration: Everyone freaked out when the automotive CEOs flew to Washington in corporate jets. Meanwhile, Obama and McCain had been criss-crossing the nation on personal jets . . . much larger personal jets:

Does anyone else sense a double standard?

So then, what really caused all this?

I’ve read some explanations that actually make sense (not in the news of course). I will share what I’ve learned—stay posted.

Cars, Women, Beauty, and Make-Up

Friday, January 23rd, 2009

Brittany and I were discussing how luxury items are typically the most recession proof (the rich tend to buy Ferrari and Rolex regardless of market conditions). She added that the beauty industry (hair, nails, make-up, etc.) is probably similar. She said that women want to feel beautiful regardless of how much is in the bank account. She predicted the beauty industry will be one of the last ones hit by this downturn.

I thought her point was very valid and well thought out. In a couple of years, we will be able to look back and know for sure if she was right, but for now we can only guess.

The beauty industry is huge.

Take a look at what we spent in 2002 (I think 2007 numbers are now available, but I don’t have time to find them).

  • $7.3B on hair, nail, and skin care services (does not include products).
  • $6.3B on cosmetics, beauty supplies, and perfume.
  • $746M on Beauty and Cosmetology Schooling.
  • Total Personal Care Services: $20.2 Billion.

What has the automotive industry done to embrace this industry?

Well . . . they put vanity mirrors on the visors and . . . not much else. I think they could do a whole lot better and will soon be trying to do better. Here are some ideas I came up with (some will only be feasible on high-end cars, but others could be options even on average cars):

Passenger Side:

  • Glove Compartment Vanity Center: Imagine a large slide-out organizer tray that holds all the make-up and supplies. Its lid would open like a brief-case and display a large vanity mirror with lights. The whole contraption would slide out of the dash but remain suspended at a comfortable height above the passengers lap.
  • Massage Chair: Like the ones in the mall except you wouldn’t feed it dollars.
  • In-Floor foot massager.

Driver Side:

  • How about a real mirror accessible when the car is in park: Men and women alike would enjoy arriving at their destination and being able to take an unstrained look in the mirror to check for wind-blown hair, food in teeth, smudged make-up, or whatever else. Why limit us to the rear-view mirror or the crappy visor mirror? Give us a large mirror with lights. I think the backside of the visor is still a great place, but make it as large as the visor itself. It could “black-out” when the car is not in park to avoid distractions while driving.

Center Console:

  • Hand-Sanitizer Dispenser.
  • Lotion Dispenser.
  • Tissue/moist towelette dispenser.

Interior Design:

  • Offer interiors designed by famous fashion designers. Ford tried this with Eddie Bauer, but other than the name stitched into the seats it was nothing special. Actually let the designers do the design!

Think I’m on to something?

Also, are there other big industries/trends that the automotive world has ignored?

Liberty: Minimize Coercion

Thursday, January 15th, 2009

I’m currently reading The Constitution of Liberty by Friedrich A. Hayek. So far it is very good, but heavy. So unless you want a very rigorous treatment of the subject I still recommend The Law by Frederic Bastiat as the best (and quickest) book to really understand the philosophy of liberty.

Hayek breaks down the 4 principle ways in which the word liberty is used. Distinguishing between these different uses was a real Ah-ha moment for me, I hope it is helpful for you:

1. Personal or Individual Liberty:

To not be coerced by the arbitrary will of others. When I refer to liberty on this blog, it’s to this type. It is the liberty I am trying to promote.

2. Political Liberty:

To be able to participate in the selection of government, legislation, and administration. Political liberty does NOT guarantee personal liberty.

3. Inner Liberty:

Being able to choose your actions based on your will and convictions. An addict is an example of someone who has lost their inner liberty—but notice the addiction is not a violation of the person’s individual liberty so long as no one coerced them into the addiction.

4. Liberty as “the ability to do what I want”:

This type of liberty is measured only by the sheer number of things a person has access to do. A rich man is “free” to do more things than a poor man. It is “freedom from” obstacles or limits. This is a dangerous definition of liberty because personal liberty (from number 1) is often jeopardized in order to increase “freedom” to do more. Notice the word “power” is a good substitute for type of liberty.

Minimize Coercion

Individual liberty (the first use mentioned) is the key and focus of the entire “freedom movement” or “philosophy of liberty.” In many ways it seems appropriate to say that the fight for liberty boils down to two words: minimize coercion.

Cadillac One, The Obama-mobile

Tuesday, January 13th, 2009

We are just one week from inauguration day. When you see Obama’s limo, I’m sure you would like to know a bit about it. It’s made by GM and based on their Top Kick truck chassis.

GMC Top Kick

Here are a few fascinating details (click on the image to enlarge):

source: gas2.0.org

Auto Manufacturers’ Predicament

Monday, January 12th, 2009

All car manufacturers have a simple goal: maximize profits. Here’s a few simple diagrams to show their options for doing so:

They can cut cost per car (produce higher volumes, cut out waste, get a government bailout, etc.):

Or they can improve the car so that customers are willing to pay more for it (improve quality, looks, performance, features, etc.):

Right now, sales volumes are dropping and forcing cost per car through the roof and causing losses instead of profits:

Auto manufacturers are desperately trying to downsize their work forces and facilities in order to get their cost per car manageable again. This problem is known as overcapacity and is the single largest problem they are facing right now. Once they reduce their capacity and get cost per car back under control, they will be very aggressive in looking for new and innovative ways to increase the value of each car—it’s one of the ways they will counter low sales volume. I imagine we will see a host of new features being released in high-end cars, and many features from current high-end cars will trickle their way down and become more standard.

With this in mind I’m working on a few feature suggestions that I think would be great options in upcoming cars. I’m particularly focused on some recession resistant features. What new car features would you like to see in the near future?

The Sizzle of Economic Freedom

Thursday, January 8th, 2009

A common criticism of free market economics is that they are “faith based economics.” Proponents of economic freedom supposedly have a dogmatic belief that free markets will produce the ideal society, but have no proof to back it up. I find this criticism utterly stupid for two reasons:

  1. Any political policy, investment, business venture, or anything else with an unknown outcome requires faith that it will produce the desired results; otherwise it would never be implemented. Even the regulations designed to fix free markets require faith to be implemented!
  2. There is loads of evidence that free markets produce exactly what their proponents claim. Take a look at this press release (from yesterday):

New Report Touts Benefits of Economic Freedom

San Francisco - The Pacific Research Institute (PRI), a free-market think tank based in California, today released The Sizzle of Economic Freedom: How Economic Freedom Helps You and Why You Should Demand More, a report that highlights the best scholarly studies measuring the benefits of economic freedom. In producing the study, the authors chose the most recent and academically rigorous peer-reviewed studies in top academic journals.

“The price of limiting economic freedom is real, but not always apparent or easily understood by citizens and voters, or especially by lawmakers,” said Lawrence J. McQuillan, Ph.D., co-author of the report and director of Business and Economic Studies at PRI. “Our report is particularly timely — in recent months, the U.S. government has undergone a massive expansion not seen in the last 30 years. More than ever, it’s important to remind workers, taxpayers, voters, business leaders, and politicians of the importance of economic freedom to our nation’s growth and prosperity and the dangers and folly of continuing down the road to ever-larger government.”

The benefits of greater economic liberty include:

  • Higher personal income
  • Less unemployment
  • Faster economic growth
  • More macroeconomic stability
  • Greater capital investment and productivity
  • More business startups
  • More entrepreneurship and innovation
  • A better-educated workforce
  • Less poverty and inequality
  • Better health
  • Greater population inflows
  • A cleaner environment
  • A better quality of life
  • More democracy and peace

“The benefits of greater economic freedom are sweeping and substantial for individuals and societies. In the future, while many Americans might still vote for restrictions on economic freedom, this study will help them to cast educated votes,” said Dr. McQuillan.

I realize that reading anything written by a couple of guys with PHDs can feel like a trip to the dentist, but this report is different. They didn’t write it hoping to flaunt their intellectual prowess to their colleagues. They wrote it so you and I can understand the benefits of economic freedom without a crash course in econometrics and regression analysis.

I think this report is a must read for anyone concerned with spreading and protecting liberty, or for anyone who cares to see what we risk losing by giving up economic freedom. Click here for a PDF version of the report.

3 Keys of Survival for Tesla, Aptera, Fisker, Miles, Pheonix, and Other Automotive Start-Ups

Tuesday, January 6th, 2009

I recently blogged about how the recession will benefit automotive start-up companies. The basic jist is that the large companies are hit harder than small ones allowing the little guys to gain precious ground.

This doesn’t mean, however, that Tesla, Aptera, and the others will have it easy throughout the recession. They like everyone else will be scraping and clawing to survive. I’m no business expert (yet), but I want to point out a few key points that I think will determine whether or not these automotive companies sink or swim (or should I say stall or rev).

1. Be Niche (NOT Mainstream).

These companies are not in a position to compete with Camrys and Accords. They shouldn’t even attempt to reach those masses. Take for example some other successful vehicles that were limited to niche groups:

  • Hummer: Rolling-billboard Niche
  • Escalade: Bling Niche
  • Harley Davidson: Need-to-feel-more-manly Niche

Tesla, Aptera, and Fisker seem to have pretty clear niches:

  • Tesla: Green-alternative-to-a-Ferrari Niche
  • Aptera: Greenest-person-in-the-city Niche
  • Fisker: Green-alternative-to-a-Mercedes E Class Niche

Pheonix Motorcars and Miles Electric, on the other hand, seem to have products aimed more mainstream (as far as I can tell).

Pheonix Motorcars: Competing with Chevy Equinox?

Pheonix Motorcars: Competing with Chevy Equinox?

2. Be Luxury.

Luxury items like Rolex are affected very little by a slumping economy. Further, every tecnological advancement has to start out in expensive luxury products:

  • Computers
  • Cell-Phones
  • GPS
  • etc.

Luxury items allow for a good profit margin even at low volumes. Tesla, with their $109K Roadster, seems to grasp this concept well. Miles, on the other hand has a $40,000 highway sedan that looks like a 10-year-old Accord. I’m not sure how they are going to attract high-end buyers.

Miles Electric

3. Pre-Orders, Pre-Orders, Pre-Orders.

These companies have to shell out a lot of money to build their cars before they can sell them. Creditors and investors are very hesitant right now. Many young companies are crushed by such cash flow problems. There is no better way to gain the confidence of creditors and investors than to have a pile of customers shelling out cash before the final product even exists.

Let the customers pay a hefty fee to reserve their car. Send them home with a fancy plaque to hang on their wall: “John Doe: Owner of the 63rd Aptera.” Keep them posted on the status of their car. Let them bring their friends by company headquarters to go for a spin in one of the company cars.

Aptera charges only $500 for their reservation fee. It seems like anyone green enough to buy and drive an oversized sperm on wheels would be willing to shell out more to be an early adopter.

Prediction.

I honestly know very little about any of the companies I’ve mentioned, and there are certainly more critical factors than the three I mentioned. But if I had to guess which companies are heading for trouble I would say Pheonix and Miles. They are too main stream and not luxury. I don’t see how that could be a recipe for success in the early stages of a new product.

Tesla, Aptera, and Fisker; on the other hand; appear to be positioning themselves well. That’s why I listed them as the 3 American Car Companies to be Excited About. It will be fun to see how it plays out.

Thoughts?


Close
E-mail It