About ten years ago, as I was learning the field of automotive repair, I watched as GM toyed with the EV1 which was followed shortly by Toyota and Honda’s hybrids. I was fascinated by the changing automotive horizon. Some industry buzz inspired me to write my term paper on hydrogen fuel cell vehicles (I wish I still had a copy). Seeing EV1’s limitations and viewing hybrids as nothing more than a stepping stone, I was convinced that hydrogen would eventually replace gasoline as the world’s principle automotive fuel. While that could end up being the case, many believe that EVs have become an even better solution.
To understand the debate between electric cars vs. hydrogen fuel cell cars, it is important to understand that both cars are eventually driven by electric motors. The difference comes in the way the energy is stored. In electric cars the energy is stored in batteries. In hydrogen fuel cell cars the energy is stored in the from of hydrogen gas which is passed through a fuel cell to convert it to electricity.
So essentially, the real debate is between batteries and hydrogen fuel cells. Which one is more effective? That question isn’t easily answered because many factors such as cost, capacity, safety, reliability, accessibility, etc. all affect that decision. Ten years ago, I thought the answer was clear. What I never could have foreseen, though, was the surge in battery technology that would be brought on by the cell-phone craze. It’s left me believing that batteries might become better at storing energy than hydrogen (they’re not there yet).
Each of the two technologies have something going for them. EVs are benefiting from the already existent electrical infrastructure. Car makers aren’t as hesitant to build them knowing that customers will have a way to fuel them. Hydrogen, on the other hand, is simply better at storing large amounts of energy (Toyota’s Highlander Hybrid FCHV gets 80 miles per kg of hydrogen and has a driving range over 500 miles.)
Each technology also has a huge obstacle to overcome: Hydrogen has almost no infrastructure. Battery developers can’t seem to produce a battery that has all the characteristics they are looking for: safe, reliable, light-weight, small, affordable, long-lasting, powerful, etc. Many batteries fulfill a number of these requirements, but none have swept the table.
I don’t know if one will win out over the other, but both have huge potential. Wouldn’t you love to be a part of either industry when its obstacles are finally overcome?
Forget the hydrogen; it’s expensive, clumsy, and potentially dangerous. Electric technology is simple, and it has vastly improved. There are now batteries that may be almost fully charged in 10 minutes. So, all we need is the utilizatin of new charge-stations around the world.